.DawahOffice.com/eg - If the Mutamattiý returns to his land, is his Tamattu' broken?

Main Menu

FaceBook FanBox

Social and RSS

Best of you

26. "The best of which man can leave behind for himself are three: a righteous child who supplicates for him, an ongoing charity whose reward continues to reach him and knowledge which others benefit from after him." [Ibn Hibbân, Hasan]

Quotes to remember

13. Ibn Qutaybah said that his disputant said to him, “What is the matter with you?” He replied to him, “I will not dispute with you.” The disputant then said, “Thus you have come to know that I am right.” Ibn Qutaybah responded, “No, but I respect myself more than that.” At this the disputant retracted and said, “And I will not claim a thing that is not my right.”

Salafs sayings

It is reported that Imām Al-Zuhrī – Allāh have mercy on him – said:

Those of our scholars who went before us used to say,”Adherence to the Sunnah is salvation, but knowledge is taken away quickly, so the revival of knowledge means the stability of religion and worldly affairs, and the loss of knowledge means the loss of all that.”

Al-Lālakā`ī, Sharh Usūl I’tiqād Ahl Al-Sunnah article 136

.Videos Categories.

English

French

Espanol

Various languages

Quran

If the Mutamattiý returns to his land, is his Tamattu' broken?

User Rating:

/ 0

Details: Category: Sheikh Otheimin; Published on Sunday, 10 November 2013 12:36; Hits: 840

If the Mutamattiý returns to his land, is his Tamattu' broken?

Question:

I heard that if the Mutamatti' returns, to his lands, his Tamattu' is broken. Is it permissible for him to perform Hajj has a Mufrid and is he not obligated to sacrifice an animal?
Answer:

Yes, if the Mutamatti' returns to his land, then he sets out travelling for Hajj from his land, he is a Mufrid. This is because of the break between the Umrah and the Hajj by his returning to his family. Hence, his starting his journey (for his land again) means that he is starting a new journey for Hajj, and therefore his Hajj is an Ifrad (Hajj only).Thus, he is not obligated to sacrifice an animal for At-Tamattu' in this case. However, if he did that in a tricky way to avoid it (the sacrifice), then it is not removed from him. This is because deception in trying to remove an obligation does not dictate its removal, just as deception in trying to do something forbidden does not dictate its allowance.
Shaykh Muhammad bin Saalih al-`Uthaymeen
Fatawa Islamiyah Darussalam Vol:4 page no.100